On the subject of movie rentals, the rumored models sound very promising. $3 per title for 30 days. Very reasonable.
It's probably the same deal that everyone else is negotiating with the studios, which actually sucks. You have the video for 30 days, but as soon as you watch even 10 seconds of it, you will only have 24 hours to finish. From personal experience, it feels way too limiting.
The other market for the touch will be people who want a super small internet device. That's the main reason why I want one. To be able to look something up on the internet while in a cafe without having to lug a laptop is priceless.
As far as I know the only way to watch a youtube video on a classic is to:
(1) Use a program or website to generate the download link for the flash file (youtube does not publish this because they don't want people saving the content to disk).
(2) Use the generated link to save the flash file manually to your PC
(3) Convert the flash file to mpeg with a converter program
(4) Copy converted mpeg file to Itunes
(5) Plug in classic and sync
With the Touch (assuming wifi) you stream mpeg4 content directly from youtube. Much easier :-)
What feature does the touch have that makes it compelling over the classic?
None. (Other’s have already shown you’ll hardly ever have access to the web while away from your computer to make it useful.)
The only thing that lures people to the touch will be the form factor.
You must be kidding. Off the top of my head...
(1) Being able to access the web via wifi and stream youtube is huge. There is wifi access almost everywhere I go. Anybody who doesn't live in the sticks is going to find this incredibly useful.
(2) Solid state is far preferable to a hard drive as far as reliability is concerned, especially when you consider that Toshiba makes the hard drives. If you don't need the space, solid state is far better.
(3) The multi touch interface is a tremendous addition, especially with respect to zooming and scrolling. It's also way cool from a tech point of view.
(4) Being able to purchase songs wirelessly will be very popular with many users. It's a pain to dock and sync, especially if you don't leave your PC on 24/7.
(5) The design is much slicker and more modern in comparison to the "classic" which looks boring and outdated.
(6) The screen is noticeably bigger (and widescreen!), which is much better for watching videos and viewing photos.
(7) It's lighter.
(8) It rotates content automatically for more ideal viewing.
I honestly don't think the classic is going to sell very well because of these differences.
As for AT&T being “inferior” in “almost” all states. Do you have evidence to back your claim?
Sure. Check the Consumer Reports review of carriers. There's a state by state breakdown of customer satisfaction, and if I recall correctly Verizon was #1 in virtually every state. Not that I like Verizon. But I do believe AT&T is inferior.
Clearly Apple would prefer you to buy the Iphone over the Touch, and they're trying to make the differentiation great enough to try to limit the number of people who abandon the idea of getting an Iphone in favor of the Touch. If the only differentiation between the Iphone and Touch is phone capabilities, it might not be enough to cause many people to bother with the added expense and hassle of switching carriers.
I'm not defending them, but I can understand the reasoning, and personally I don't really mind because I think that user created web apps and hackers will make this all moot anyways.
Personally, I think that the ipod touch without any internet capabilities is still a great deal, and that with safari it's an incredible deal.
Remember, you're paying a lot more than a $100 premium for the iphone. Over two years, the iphone will cost you ~$2100. I have a cell phone right now that costs $100/year, so this is a significant amount more to spend for a few additional features.
I'd be more inclined to call iphone purchasers the suckers, especially considering they're locked in to AT&T, an inferior carrier in almost all states.
Yes, you can definitely purchase any itunes song you want wirelessly from any wifi location. I'm sure videos will follow soon. I'm guessing the wireless sync wasn't done because of other reasons (piracy concerns? technological issues?) They certainly didn't leave it out to spite you because they could have only gained from having that functionality.
Since when do you have to be in a starbucks to purchase songs via wifi? Any wifi connection will allow you to purchase wirelessly through the itunes store. It wouldn't make sense otherwise.
The applications that are missing from the ipod touch (weather, stocks, email, etc) can just be developed as web apps (if they haven't already!). Web apps for the ipod are very easy to write, which is why there are already a bunch available, and new ones are being created every day. Here are a couple sites I found after 10 seconds of searching:
http://www.rev2.org/2007/07/02/top-25-web-apps-for-the-iphone/
http://ipodapplicationlist.com/
To quote cleverdevil.com:
"... “can web apps for the iPhone [and ipod touch] be cooler than native apps...?” to which I think the answer will be a resounding “you bet!” The iPhone [and ipod touch] comes with a version of Safari which supports HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, which is what has been used to create such outstanding tools as Google Maps, Basecamp, Delicious, and Flickr.""
So the fact that the ipod touch is missing some native internet apps is rather meaningless. It's the apps you want to run without available web access that will require more creative solutions (or an open SDK by Apple).
Movie Rentals Will Significantly Increase iPod and iPhone Storage
Why No Fries with the iPod touch?
Why No Fries with the iPod touch?
Why No Fries with the iPod touch?
Why No Fries with the iPod touch?
Why No Fries with the iPod touch?
Why No Fries with the iPod touch?
Why No Fries with the iPod touch?
Why No Fries with the iPod touch?
Why No Fries with the iPod touch?
Why No Fries with the iPod touch?